Nancy Writebol, at Emory University Hospital, Atlanta. Photograpgh: John Spink/AP |
In August 2014, when I wrote an article about Ebola being an American bioweapon in Nigeria, some people, who thought that America has the interest of Africans in heart, harangued me and urged me to use my time for ‘meaningful write-ups,’ (Laughs).
However I was glad many others equally shared my thoughts on the possibility of Patrick Sawyer being covertly used as a bioterrorist in Nigeria by the American government.
In those write-ups I
had given reasons why some powerful forces in the western world, especially America, want to depopulate the
black race, and Nigeria, being the most populous black nation in the world,
became a country of interest.
Today, many writers
have written extensively on the documented evidences by minority of scientists
and researchers describing Ebola, HIV and some other viruses as being created
in a bio-warfare laboratory through design, manipulation and combination of
various viral genomes to produce a pre-meditated and hazardous material capable
of decimating mankind.
The
Man Made Origins of AIDS and Ebola
A Dutch professor and Experimental
Micro-Surgeon, Johan Van Dongen, in his powerful book, AIDS and Ebola: The Greatest Crime in Medical History against Mankind
revealed that Ebola and AIDS were invented in a laboratory.
He revealed
that Ebola virus is human made and tested on black skinned people in Uganda and
Zaire (Congo) in Africa, in order to find vaccines against it for military
defending purposes.
Professor Johan Van
Dongen, whose researches dates back in 1972, has been
involved in thousands of organ transplantation and immunological experiments. In
the course of his work he discovered, not only in his experiments but also in
the extensive scientific literature, the role of an obligatory cofactor that
transactivates a “Dormant” virus HIV in specific human cells. And this
obligatory cofactor is deliberately introduced into mostly black-skinned
African people, governed by massive environmental factors in order to
depopulate Africa.
Biowarfare scientists are able to make black-skinned
people artificially susceptible for HIV by using controllable diseases as a
cover-up.
Today, Professor Dongen, formally at Microsurgical
Educational Institute in Holland, is being persecuted by western powers for
revealing the crime perpetrated against Africans. He once told
Journalist Joel Savage of Diplomatic
Aspects Newspaper:
"A lot has happened but I am safe for now, for no
reasons I have been removed from LinkedIn social platform, losing almost all my
contacts which I have build up in no time.”
I can’t live with this crime for the rest of my
life. I‘ve lost my job, my house and they stopped selling my book four years
ago. The only thing I have strongly behind me is my wife,” says Professor
Dongen.
Similarly, an American
pathologist, Dr Robert Strecker and his brother Ted Strecker, in 1983,
conducted extensive research and review of medical literatures on the origin of
AIDS, and revealed that the conventional beliefs and theory of ‘African green
monkey’- origin of HIV by the government and medical society was nothing but
fraud. Their findings were compiled in a most controversial 96-minute video
known as ‘The Strecker Memorandum’ as well as series of revealing documents known
as ‘The Bio-Attack Alert.’
Some forces in America were not comfortable with ‘The Strecker Memorandum’ and other revelations
of the Streckers. And in 1986, Ted Strecker, brother to Dr Robert, was
found dead in his apartment in a questionable circumstance. The death was termed
‘suicide’ by the authorities concerned.
Other
Voices of HIV/AIDS Theory Dissidents
In an article by YourNewsWire author Adl-Tabatabai wrote extensively about HIV dissidents scientist thus:
In an article by YourNewsWire author Adl-Tabatabai wrote extensively about HIV dissidents scientist thus:
Smith et al in his publication, The phylogenetic history of immunodeficiency virus published in 1988 in the medical journal Nature, claimed that the true origin of the diverse HIV-strains existed between 1938 and 1948.
His studies was collaborated by Sharp et al in an article: Understanding the origins of Aids viruses,
also in the journal Nature who showed the true origin of HIV.
Then followed by Meyers et al with the title, The phylogenetic analysis of the HIVs.
But the most important article is described in the medical journal Lancet by scientist L.A. Evans et al, who discovered the Simultaneous isolation of HIV-1 and HIV-2 from an Aids patient.
Then followed by Meyers et al with the title, The phylogenetic analysis of the HIVs.
But the most important article is described in the medical journal Lancet by scientist L.A. Evans et al, who discovered the Simultaneous isolation of HIV-1 and HIV-2 from an Aids patient.
All these scientists mentioned above agreed that the
distribution of the HIV virus was an intentional action. Their findings make it
very conceivable that this distribution was intentional because sometimes both the
new viruses HIV-1 and HIV-2 respectively, and HTLV-IV, exist in one and the same
person, according to Evans.
Why Would U.S. Own A Patent On Ebola?
In patent laws all over the world, rights of ownership are granted to persons or organizations only on what they ‘invented,’ and not on the things that have existed in nature or by accident.
But today the U.S.
Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in Atlanta, Georgia, owns a patent on a
particular strain of Ebola known as “EboBun.” It’s patent N0. is CA2741523A1,
and was awarded in 2010.
The CDC claimed that
EboBun was isolated from the patients suffering from hemorrhagic fever in an
outbreak in Uganda years ago (remember that Professor Johan Van Dongen had revealed
how the human made Ebola was tested in Uganda and Congo by this same people).
It also claimed the virus was not the same variant believed to have ravaged some parts of West Africa recently (which means they have created another strain, as they did with EboBun, to produce another vaccine just to fortify, reduce threats and increase the offensive chances of their military defense in a biological warfare.
It also claimed the virus was not the same variant believed to have ravaged some parts of West Africa recently (which means they have created another strain, as they did with EboBun, to produce another vaccine just to fortify, reduce threats and increase the offensive chances of their military defense in a biological warfare.
Nancy Writebol, US Ebola victim, at Emory University Hosp., in
2014. Photo: John Spink/AP |
From the patent
document, the U.S. government is also claiming ownership over all Ebola viruses
that share as little as 70% similarities with the Ebola (EboBun) it invented.
Were They Created for Commercial Purposes?
“Why would the U.S.
government claim to have ‘invented’ Ebola and then claim an exclusive monopoly
over its ownership? Why the patent? Patenting Ebola seems as odd as trying to
patent cancer or diabetes. Why would a government organization claim to have
‘invented’ this infectious disease and then claim a monopoly over its exploitation
for commercial use? Does the CDC hope to collect a royalty on Ebola vaccines?”
queried an analyst.
Apart from the issue of
biowarfare and bioterrorism, pundits are also worried that the reason for such
hazardous “man made diseases,” is for the purpose of exploiting and harnessing
the commercial aspect of it by the U.S. government in collaboration with
American based pharmaceutical companies.
It would be recalled
that Mapp Biopharmaceutical Inc., the San Diego based company that developed
ZMapp, a ‘secret serum’ used to treat some American Ebola patients in 2014, has
been working with the National Institutes of Health and the Defense Threat
Reduction Agency, an arm of the U.S. military responsible for countering weapons of mass destruction,
for many years.
Hence it is possible
that, apart from the issue of biological warfare and bioterrorism, making money
for the U.S. government and its agencies through global commercialization of
its drug and vaccine developments is also considered by the creator of these
viruses.
However, in whichever
way it goes, all we now know is that nowadays monkeys do not get AIDS when
infected with the human Aids virus. The same goes for tuberculosis until the
moment that monkeys in a laboratory made receptive.
Therefore black-skinned
people are under no circumstances contaminated with AIDS by monkeys with or
without eating them. And in Nigeria, people have resorted back to eating their once cherished bush meats without getting contaminated with Ebola virus.
That is so to speak a
criminal scientific fairytale!
Chike Nnamani, a scientist and public affairs analyst, writes from Abuja, Nigeria.
Chike Nnamani, a scientist and public affairs analyst, writes from Abuja, Nigeria.
No comments:
Post a Comment